Most Popular

Bilateral Economies of Scope in International Trade

Yao Amber Li, Sichuang Xu, Stephen R. Yeaple, Tengyu Zhao, Jan 15, 2025

This paper presents evidence that firms’ export and import decisions within the same foreign market are complementary, due to bilateral economies of scope that allow substantial cost savings when engaging in both activities. By quantifying these savings through a structural model, we show that bilateral economies of scope significantly enhance firms’ participation in international trade and amplify the effects of trade liberalization, offering new insights for policymakers and researchers.

Input Trade Liberalization and Firm Labor Market Power in China

Illenin O. Kondo, Yao Amber Li, Wei Qian, Jul 30, 2025

More trade, more jobs? Or fewer? China’s accession to the WTO has catalyzed a rich research agenda on the labor market consequences of trade liberalization. Departing from the assumptions of perfectly competitive labor markets, we ask whether Chinese firms exercised more or less labor market power when input tariffs fell with China’s WTO accession? We show that input trade liberalization reduced labor monopsony power in China, especially for skill-intensive firms and in markets with more labor supply growth.

Horizon Risk in Rental Housing: Evidence from a PropTech Rental Platform

Jiayin Hu, Maggie R. Hu, Shangchen Li, Yingguang Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Jul 10, 2024

This article discussing that landlords in areas with faster housing price growth tend to offer shorter-term contracts and are less likely to renew expired contracts.

Learning by Investing: Entrepreneurial Spillovers from Venture Capital

Josh Lerner, Jinlin Li, Tong Liu, May 22, 2024

The experience gained by individual investors from participating in venture capital funds significantly enhances their entrepreneurial capabilities in the high-tech sector.

AI Patents in the United States and China: Measurement, Organization, and Knowledge Flows

Hanming Fang, Xian Gu, Hanyin Yan, Wu Zhu, Jun 16, 2026

ebates about artificial intelligence (AI) often ask whether the United States and China are technologically decoupling. Using a new high-precision measure of AI patents, we show a more nuanced picture. AI innovation in the two countries is converging in scale and technological direction, but remains highly asymmetric in institutional organization, geographic diffusion, and cross-border knowledge dependence. Chinese AI patents rely heavily on US frontier technologies, while US reliance on Chinese innovation is more limited.